The Academy of Motion Picture Arts & Sciences just announced the nominees for Academy Awards this year. Did you know they have a Museum? Writer strikes aside, the show will go on, February 24th! Including Oscar Night® America at the Hollywood Theater - Portland’s only sanctioned event - and a whole lot of fun!
Admittedly, this year I only saw a fraction of the nominated films. I still wish to get to see The Savages, No Country for Old Men and There Will Be Blood before the February broadcast, though based on knowledge, clips, rumors and conjecture I am going to try and forge my opinion of what may take home the statuettes this year. Of course, with the debates all over the news, it hints at the split between the popularization of what may be as opposed to what deserves to rise to the top. Of course Cate Blanchett deserves to win both categories, but I am being conservative. And how many times is the so subtle Laura Linney going to be nominated before going home with gold? Philip Seymour Hoffman is the best actor of this generation, but the under-recognized brilliance of Tom Wilkinson was simply amazing in this particular film. Is this a comeback from Daniel Day-Lewis? And how cool is it to see the darling of the early 80’s Soho scene, Julian Schnabel, go from tossing plates to canvas, now an Oscar nominated director! He makes films derived from powerful scripts, here with almost impossible premise from the perspective of someone who speaks solely with eye movement? There are so many reasons built into questioning a process of greatness and half of that might sound like:
• • • • • •
Ask Yourself?
- Have they previously been inducted?
- Where are they in their career?
- Will this be for entire career as opposed for this project?
- How consistent have they been in past projects and how does this stand out, or remain within the same consistent quality?
- Was this the right projects in their hands?
- Character acting is popular…did they play the same part before in a different film?
- Was it a surprise sleeper hit?
- Box office returns.

BEST PICTURE
“Atonement”
“Juno”
“Michael Clayton”
*** “No Country for Old Men” ***
“There Will Be Blood”
BEST ACTRESS
*** Cate Blanchett, “Elizabeth: The Golden Age” ***
Julie Christie, “Away From Her”
Marion Cotillard, “La Vie en Rose”
Laura Linney, “The Savages”
Ellen Page, “Juno”
BEST ACTOR
George Clooney, “Michael Clayton”
*** Daniel Day-Lewis, “There Will Be Blood” ***
Johnny Depp, “Sweeney Todd”
Viggo Mortensen, “Eastern Promises”
Tommy Lee Jones, “In the Valley of Elah”
BEST SUPPORTING ACTRESS
Cate Blanchett, “I’m Not There”
Ruby Dee, “American Gangster”
Saoirse Ronan, “Atonement”
Amy Ryan, “Gone Baby Gone”
*** Tilda Swinton, “Michael Clayton” ***
BEST SUPPORTING ACTOR
Casey Affleck, “The Assassination of Jesse James by the Coward Robert Ford”
Javier Bardem, “No Country for Old Men”
Hal Holbrook, “Into The Wild”
Philip Seymour Hoffman, “Charlie Wilson’s War”
*** Tom Wilkinson, “Michael Clayton” ***
BEST DIRECTOR
Paul Thomas Anderson, “There Will Be Blood”
*** Joel Coen and Ethan Coen, “No Country for Old Men” ***
Julian Schnabel, “The Diving Bell and the Butterfly”
Tony Gilroy, “Michael Clayton”
Jason Reitman, “Juno”
• • • • • •
This morning I did a piece on the Oscars, and one of the better Hollywood actors, at his prime, Australian-born Heath Ledger, was found dead at age 28 in New York. The Herald Sun says “Ledger’s shocking demise is not only a terrible loss for his daughter Matilda, his Perth-based family and his many fans, it also throws into disarray two movies.” Aside from the point of the practical, it probably puts an important spotlight on the effects of being watched constantly through the public eye. The reports say it may have been drug-related (possibly an overdose, possibly a suicide). A lost soul with so much promise, taken potentially sooner than basic popularity would have it, yes? He took my breath away in Brokeback Mountain, a role that hopefully helped in some small way shape-shift people’s general perception of homosexuality. SEE STORY
• • •
[ Re-Print of my 2005 OregonLive.com review of Brokeback Mountain ]
RUGGED ROMANCE / SILVER SCREEN
Gentlemen do not always prefer blondes but is Aussie actor Heath Ledger the most gorgeous man on film? OK, so this is about the new Ang Lee vehicle, Brokeback Mountain set in the rural wilderness of Wyoming. From a short story penned by Annie Proulx (The Shipping News) it’s basically something of an unspoken love story between two straight, married cowboys. Or so they thought.
Taiwanese director Lee (The Wedding Banquet, The Ice Storm) is quite an interesting filmmaker who truly builds raw character stories, isolated and real, funny and paralyzing. In Brokeback Mountain (Focus Features) he captured the great outdoors and the silences between nature and its inhabitants - and between the characters themselves. The film captures the craggedly testosterone-fueled relationship between two men who meet in the Summer of ‘62 while working as sheep herders. The two, wide-eyed amateur rodeo guy Jack Twist (Jake Gyllenhaal) and Ennis Del Mar (Ledger), a down-on-his-luck strong, silent type, fall deeply in love, albeit at a safe distance. And though it’s not “love” at first sight, it builds like a campfire. Over time as careers and relationships and responsibilities emerge, they slowly grow apart, living in Texas and Wyoming, and both in and out of marriage with children. They keep in contact via postcard, which adds to the ultimate, deep romantic edge to the film. They meet up a few times annually for so-called “fishing trips”. The look is dusty, filled with open air and the essence of the wild west. The film depicts flailing, stale, failed, and otherwise quirky dry relationships in a matter-of-fact way (except for the energy between the two leads). And what they have is certainly a secret unto only them (well, almost).
A simple shirt is a metaphor for unrequited love. The women in the film (Roberta Maxwell, Anne Hathaway and Michelle Williams) all play a specific and pivotal role in making magic happen on screen, for adding an allure of silent understanding, domestic tension and even implied deceit. The film portrays the beauty of innocent passion without the use of blatant sex scenes (not to say that wouldn’t have been welcome) nor any implication of stereotype. They murmer about the possibilities of a life together, mull it, fear it, and nearly forget it. The life the two lead characters share is in the open wilderness of God’s country, portrayed in a staccato, vacation-style fleeting temporaryness. Momentary slices in time.
Despite being set in the 1960’s, the film points out the honest side of keeping secrets without being intentionally homophobic, and to some degree depicts a time when acting on your passion may not have felt like a political action, but more of a social taboo. Ledger stands out dramatically (award-winning performance) and is unbelievably real in his character. Though of few words, his physical performance is genuinely emotive and rooted in a gritty, self-loathing, very human, powerful man somewhat on the edge!
Judging by the near sold out crowds lining up to see this flick, on four screens no less, I recommend you may want to try and catch it before its general release. A rare cinematic glimpse into the life of two men who realize that life on and around the plain is anything but.
• • •
Rest In Eternal Peace